OK, sports fans . . .
The hypothesis of the thread is:
"Using a long hose isn't just for tech divers . . ."
. . . not about pony bottles, HID lights, split fins, who owns a dive shop, who has hemorrhoids, or whatever.
The antithesis of the hypothesis would be, "Using a long hose is just for tech divers."
To prove the hypothesis true, all one needs do is provide one example wherein a diver, other than a technical diver, could, or would, employ a long primay regulator hose.
To prove the anthesis false, all one needs do is provide one example where in a diver, other than a technical diver, could, or would, employ a long primary regulator hose.
To wit: A recreational diver has entered an environment from which he cannot extract himself. The diver is running low on air. The entrapped diver's buddy's standard length primary regulator hose and his alternate airsource hoses are too short to reach the trapped diver to supply him with breathing gas. If the primary regulator hose was a 5' or 7' hose, it would reach the entrapped diver.
I have provided one example that proves the hypothesis true and the antithesis false, therefore the hypothesis is true.
Quod erat demonstratum.
Can we move on along now?