- Messages
- 93,920
- Reaction score
- 92,671
- Location
- On the Fun Side of Trump's Wall
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I'm only saying it changes something for me, I dove air for about 15 years before trying nitrox. I was stunned by the difference in myself after doing a familiar dive on a different gas. I don't think I've ever met anyone who has had the same result. I did a dive to 135 on nitrox and was so fuzzy headed I couldn't even tell when I needed to clear my ears or add air to my wing. I took my cue from my buddy, when he did it I did it. I would be interested in trying trimix on the same dive to see if there is a noticeable difference on a deep dive.
Ber :lilbunny:
Must be a woman/man thingie. The Lovely Young Kat swears that compared to air, she feels better and sharper diving Nitrox, and better after a Nitrox dive, while I can't tell any difference at all.NWGratefulDiver:I have not noticed any difference in narcosis susceptibility between nitrox and air.
You forgot "spare air"
nitrox ... of course ...
Must be a woman/man thingie. The Lovely Young Kat swears that compared to air, she feels better and sharper diving Nitrox, and better after a Nitrox dive, while I can't tell any difference at all.
She says it's 'cause I'm "just another insensitive man."
I reckon she may be onto something...
Rick
Could it be from all the beer typically consumed immedeately after the last dive by most male divers vs. female divers typical choice to discuss the dive?
Well Rick already gave the answer I was about to give.
Have you actually checked out any trimix training material?
You'll find that practically all of it uses the (100% - He) rule.
NOAA Diving Manual, Diving for Science and Technology. 4th. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2002. "[16.3.1.2.4] ... since oxygen has some narcotic properties, it is appropriate to include the oxygen in the END calculation when using trimixes (Lambersten et al. 1977,1978). The non-helium portion (i.e., the sum of the oxygen and the nitrogen) is to be regarded as having the same narcotic potency as an equivalent partial pressure of nitrogen in air, regardless of the proportions of oxygen and nitrogen."
Some years ago the rule was to consider only the N2 as narcotic but AFAIK current thinking is based on the fact that although oxygen has greater lipid solubility than nitrogen and therefore should be more narcotic (Meyer-Overton correlation), it is likely that some of the oxygen is metabolized, thus reducing its effect to a level similar to that of nitrogen.
You can also check out
Rubicon Research Repository: Item 123456789/2810
"Title: Roles of nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide in compressed-air narcosis
Abstract: In an attempt to determine the roles of nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide in compressed-air narcosis, the effects on performance (mental function and manual dexterity) of adding CO2 in various concentrations to the inspired gas under three different conditions were studied in eight healthy male volunteers. The three conditions were: (1) air breathing at 1.3 ATA; (2) oxygen breathing at 1.7 ATA; and (3) air breathing at 8.0 ATA (same inspired O2 pressure as in (2)). By relating performance to the changes induced in end-tidal (alveolar) gas pressures, and comparing the data from the three conditions, we arrived at the following results and conclusions. A rise in O2 pressure to 1.65 ATA, or in N2 pressure to 6.3 ATA at a constant high PO2 level, caused a significant decrement of 10percent in mental function but no consistent effect on psychomotor function. A rise in end-tidal PCO2 of 10 mmHg caused an impairment of approximately 10percent in both mental and psychomotor functions. The results suggest that, at raised partial pressures, all three gases have narcotic properties,....."
I'm really curious where the 300 FSW figure that you quoted comes from.