No option in the poll for a finger spool?
Given that recreational wreck penetration has many limitation in respect of penetration, especially in regards to distance (max linear distance from surface 40m/130ft), there really isn't much need to spend $$$'s on a high capacity penetration reel.
A 50m/164' finger spool is more than sufficient for penetration at that level of technicality. The advantages are that it is very easy to carry and deploy.... and it is very cheap. The value of the reel has an important role in potential dive safety. It adds safety, but can also cause significant safety issues. The dollar value of the reel is one of those issues. More than a few scuba divers have died because they've made bad decisions and taken extra risks to retrieve expensive equipment.
When penetrating wrecks, there's always a chance of silt-out and high stress. Under those circumstances, you'll be aborting the penetration and leaving the wreck. A small fumble with the reel, a tangle, a tie-off that you can't remove easily, a highly stressed diver, a low-on-air diver..any glitch...and, all of a sudden, your reel can become a liability that delays your exit. You should always be prepared to leave your reel/line in place and exit immediately, if safety demands it. Sometimes you might not be able to return that day to recover your reel. With that in mind, how much mental determination do you possess, where you can 'write-off' an expensive reel in trade for safety?
I've learned to view penetration reels as 'disposable'.... certainly for recreational diving. I've got a few expensive high-capacity reels, but I won't use them unless the dive/penetration plan demands it. Having completed 000's of recreational wreck penetrations, I've yet to encounter a dive plan that demanded a high-capacity reel.