Wrecks - When is it ok

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

mdc531

Guest
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Central New York
# of dives
0 - 24
if ever to take something from the site? I have never done this but wondered who has and what were the circumstances?
 
depends where you are and what site; some countries have strict laws and will prosecute you. this is the don't get your ***** thrown in jail argument. General thinking is that taking artifacts makes the wreck less interesting for others to dive. this is the consideration argument. many folks dive wrecks for the purpose of finding artifacts, such as the doria. me, i say if it's legal, it's your call. I personally would take an artifact from a wreck that was not protected.
 
If it was your boat -- help yourself. Still laughing at KeyLargoBrent's comment when giving us our boat safety brief -- "if the boat catches fire or begins to take on water..the life jackets and fire extinguisher are here...but grab your dive gear if you have time so we can dive the virgin wreck."
 
Do not bugger about with war graves, if someone has "arrested" the wreck you must get their permission to salvage anything, if the wreck is protected or laws state not to, otherwise have at it.
Long ago crowbars and hammers were standard parts of my group's dive gear (got some really cool stuff) but my perspective now is to leave well enough alone....my daughter gets aggravated with me because I will not let her salvage anything...
 
how do you know when a site is protected? my guess is when you must register the dive...nys makes a blanket statement of you cant take anything from anywhere...how true is that?

also, are you boardering hypocrit if you are a member of a preservation society and till pilfer and pilage non protected wrecks?

a lot of these questions might seem elementary but i am still new to diving but honestly finding stuff is my motivation most of the time (you can only look at so many fish)
 
If the State says you cannot take anything from State waters, then you cannot take anything from State waters.

If you like finding stuff there are other avenues than wrecks,fossil diving is fun. Yuo could also dive the site of old piers and docks, lots of bottles, coins and so on to be found in these areas. You can look for areas formely used by sailing vessels that are no longer used for docking; sailors used the water as their garbage can, lots of interesting stuff at the bottom of old harbors...
 
the state has control of water allowed it by law. the US has juridiction over water allowed it by law. in general, after 12 miles from shore (don't exactly remember), you are in international waters. wreck diving is liberal in international waters, with the exception of war graves.
 
Another thing to consider is that a boat or ship that sunk with people on board, if anyone lost there life, it should be considered a grave. I think it is ok to dive on it, but respect it. I wouldn't take anything be it war grave or just anything ship where people perished.

The other major consideration to take into account even it if was all legal and ok to take things at a site. Do you have the knowledge, experience and know how to do it properly. If you move an item, it is no longer in its original frame of context. This has to do with archaeology, do you know what you are doing basically is what I am saying. Consider this, you might see a just a neat pipe in a room on a wreck. To the trained eye they might be able to say that this type of pipe would denote what type of person (passenger or crew, wealthy or not, officier or enlisted) used that room or was in the room shortly before the ship was lost. Once you move it, don't record it with proper reference to to where exactly in the room (XYZ axis), drawings of how it was exactly found or pictures. When someone actually comes to study the wreck, all that information is lost.

By all means, explore for wreck and historically important site under and above water but once you find it. Don't do anyting until you notify people who spent and dedicated their life's work to taking care of those things.
 
Most states have antiquities acts that specify anything found of historical value belongs to the state. Even if you find gold on a Texas beach, you are "supposed" to turn it in.

From an archeology stand point, MHO is leaving it alone is best. Most of us don't have the proper equipment to conserve these artifacts and eventually, we'll lose them.
 
US State waters

For the most part state waters extend for 3 miles from shore. The exception is enclosed or Internal waters such as Long Island Sound, Chesapeake and Delaware Bays etc. where State waters can extend to a median line between states. The Great Lakes are a special case, all of the bottom is State or Canadian lands.

In Long Island Sound this can be less then 1 mile up to about 11 miles from shore depending on the area. States control the bottom per their own laws and most States control wrecks under the Abandoned Shipwreck law. As for how old a wreck has to be, NY says 50 years, some other states say 100. CT has never passed any laws under the Abandoned Shipwreck law but does have a law about removal of any object “embedded in state lands” which the bottom of Long Island Sound inside of the State line is. For a wreck this seems to mean, if you can see it, you can take it. If you have to dig for it, it is State property. However, no State laws will negate any Federal laws or treaties that may pertain to a particular wreck such as sovereign immune wrecks.

One note on the Abandoned Shipwreck law, abandonment is no longer considered to have happened by the simple passage of time. If you can buy the salvage rights of a wreck from the insurer or direct descendent of the owner you will have a very good case to void the Abandoned Shipwreck law and any other State laws.

Now for the other “waters”
(I stole this from another site)

Territorial waters,

Or a territorial sea, is a belt of coastal waters extending at most twelve nautical miles (but possibly less, at the coastal country's discretion) from the mean low water mark of a littoral state that is regarded as the sovereign territory of the state, except that foreign ships (both military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it.[1]

A sovereign state has complete jurisdiction over internal waters, where not even innocent passage is allowed. Territorial waters extend up to 12 nautical miles (22 km) from the mean low water mark adjacent to land, or from internal waters, as per the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The mean low water mark may be an unlimited distance from permanently exposed land, provided that some portion of elevations exposed at low tide but covered at high tide (like mud flats) is within 12 nautical miles of permanently exposed land. Completely enclosed seas, lakes, and rivers are considered internal waters, as are waters landward of lines connecting fringing islands along a coast or landward of lines across the mouths of rivers that flow into the sea. Bays are defined as indentations between headlands having an area greater than that of a semicircle. If they do not exceed 24 nautical miles (44 km) between headlands then they are internal waters; if their entrance is wider, then that portion landward of a 24 nautical mile straight line that touches opposite low-water marks across the bay positioned to contain the greatest water area are internal waters. All archipelagic waters within the outermost islands of an archipelagic state like Indonesia or the Philippines are also considered internal waters.

Contiguous Zone

Control over a contiguous zone, up to an additional 24 − N nautical miles beyond the territorial sea, where the territorial sea is N nautical miles wide, N≤12, is permitted by a coastal nation to "prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations". The United States invoked a contiguous zone on 24 September 1999.[2]

Conflicts still occur whenever a coastal nation claims an entire gulf as its territorial waters while other nations only recognize the more restrictive definitions of the UN convention. Two recent conflicts occurred in the Gulf of Sidra where Libya has claimed the entire gulf as its territorial waters and the U.S. has twice violently enforced freedom of navigation rights (Gulf of Sidra incident (1981), Gulf of Sidra incident (1989)).

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
An exclusive economic zone extends for 200 nautical miles (370 km) beyond the baselines of the territorial sea, thus it includes the territorial sea and its contiguous zone.[3] A coastal nation has control of all economic resources within its exclusive economic zone, including fishing, mining, oil exploration, and any pollution of those resources. However, it cannot regulate or prohibit passage or loitering above, on, or under the surface of the sea, whether innocent or belligerent, within that portion of its exclusive economic zone beyond its territorial sea. Before 1982, coastal nations arbitrarily extended their territorial waters in an effort to control activities which are now regulated by the exclusive economic zone, such as offshore oil exploration or fishing rights (see Cod War). Indeed, the exclusive economic zone is still popularly, though erroneously, called a coastal nation's territorial waters.

Note: Shipwrecks are not controlled under the UN definition of the EEZ

The continental shelf of a coastal nation extends out to its continental margin, but at least 200 nautical miles from the baselines of its territorial sea. The continental margin is defined by a series of points not more than 60 nautical miles (111 km) apart where the thickness of sedimentary rocks is at least one per cent of the height of the continental shelf above the foot of the continental slope, but not more than 60 nautical miles inshore from it. The foot of the continental slope is where the maximum change in the gradient of the seabed occurs. The continental margin cannot exceed 350 nautical miles (648 km) beyond the baselines of the territorial sea or 100 nautical miles (185 km) beyond the 2,500-metre depth, unless "natural components of the continental margin, such as its plateaux, rises, caps, banks and spurs" but not submarine ridges are farther out. The coastal nation has control of all resources on or under its continental shelf, living or not, but no control over any living organisms above the shelf that are beyond its exclusive economic zone.[4] Ireland has become one of the first countries to define its continental shelf in accordance with the UN convention.[5]

Pirate radio broadcasting from artificial marine fixtures or anchored ships can be controlled by the affected coastal nation or other nations wherever that broadcast may originate, whether in the territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, the continental shelf or even on the high seas.[6]

Thus a coastal nation has total control over its internal waters, slightly less control over territorial waters, and ostensibly even less control over waters within the contiguous zones. However, it has total control of economic resources within its exclusive economic zone as well as those on or under its continental shelf.

So, beyond State waters and on non sovereign immune ships it looks to be wide open. But, EPA or National park laws such as with the USS Monitor may be applicable to US citizens even beyond the 12 mile limit.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom