wapyaly
Contributor
I watched a documentary about a British girl who had some embryos frozen as she had treatment for cancer. Her partner and her separated and she had to go to the high court in London to ask a judge to rule that she could have the embryo's implanted, because her ex had withdrawn his consent. This was her one and only chance at being able to have her own child. The judge ruled against her and in favour of the man. He also ruled that the embryo's had to be destroyed. My heart really went out to her. I felt sorry for her that she would be unable to have her own child, but I also could understand that the man did not want these embryo's to be born to his ex partner. I felt that this man was destroying his ex partners only chance of having her own biological child and that the judge had a very difficult decision to make. In the circumstances if I were the judge I would have ruled for the woman. I totally accept that the father has rights in this situation too, but this was her one and only chance at being a mother. Who would you have ruled in favour of and why?