I would have done that profile without a second thought.
There's something else going on.
As would I, and three more dives just like those two on a liveaboard trip. Maybe four more dives that day shore diving in Bonaire.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I would have done that profile without a second thought.
There's something else going on.
It doesn't really matter. vPlanner is happy with that profile, with no deco and no safety stop and anything from a 10'/minute to 30'/minute ascent rate. I would have done that profile without a second thought.
There's something else going on.
flots.
The profile - Dive 1-55.5 ft. 42:49. Surface interval 43:55 Dive 2-55.5 ft. 44:21. Ascent rate was less than 30ft./min. on both dives, much slower on first dive. I'm getting all of this information as it was uploaded from my dive computer to my PC. I think the slow rate on the first dive was due to seeing a bunch of barracuda, and having plenty of air. Like I said, this is a profile that has not caused any issues in the past. Plenty of air remained on both dives, nothing unusual as far as the dives went. I was not cold, and did not over exert myself. I dive solo with a redundant air source in the form of a 13cf pony bottle, which was unused.
Full 3 min. safety stops on both dives.
Had you planned this dive out on tables would you have done it? I
I'd throw that damn computer in a box until until I'd developed the discipline and good sense to plan my dives as square profiles beforehand and then MAYBE allow a little extra for the computers sampling rate.
Yeah I'd call that a deserved hit.
You are certainly right that using square profiles and tables, you were considerably in violation of NDLs, especially given what you say are the ascent rates. DAN's published study on ascent rates compared 60FPM, 30 FPM, and 10 FPM ascent rates, and the 10 FPM ascent rate was the worst.
Good on the OP for not 'shrugging off' the initial symptoms and then following up by calling DAN and going to the hospital. This could have gotten worse.
...//...Any ideas on what that could be? I was comfortable with this profile myself until I looked more closely at the tables. If something else is going on, I would sure like to figure out what it is.