We have to be careful when using the word "obese." Here is a picture of someone who is rated as Obese according to the BMI. He was somehow fit enough to be the most valuable player in the SuperBowl a couple of years ago despite being so horribly obese.
Yes, that is an extreme example, but there is a connection to this thread. The BMI starts with a near anorexic model as an ideal and then assumes that any additional weight MUST come courtesy of fat. All muscle is treated as if it were fat. You don't have to be a football player or a bodybuilder to have enough muscle to throw that scale off.
No one has ever mistaken me for a bodybuilder, but I have a fair amount of muscle, and I do work out to maintain the strength needed for all the work related to technical diving. A number of years ago, when I was in better shape than I am now, I had a hydrostatic body fat test done, and that is considered to be the most accurate measure of body composition. Although by the BMI I was well overweight, my body fat composition was pretty good. The analysis I got predicted what my body fat percentage would be if I lost weight solely through fat loss. According to that chart, if I got down to ZERO body fat, I would still be overweight according to the BMI.
Around that time, DAN's Alert Diver magazine published an article about the high percentage of dive fatalities in which the divers were overweight or obese, according to the BMI. I challenged that article on the basis of what I just wrote above, and they then did a follow up article in which they compared ways to determine fitness to dive. Their conclusion was that the BMI was the very worst way to measure personal fitness.
If we are going to talk about obesity for this discussion, I think we have to use the "I know it when I see it" defintion--someone with scade of fat and not a lot of accompanying muscular development.
Yes, that is an extreme example, but there is a connection to this thread. The BMI starts with a near anorexic model as an ideal and then assumes that any additional weight MUST come courtesy of fat. All muscle is treated as if it were fat. You don't have to be a football player or a bodybuilder to have enough muscle to throw that scale off.
No one has ever mistaken me for a bodybuilder, but I have a fair amount of muscle, and I do work out to maintain the strength needed for all the work related to technical diving. A number of years ago, when I was in better shape than I am now, I had a hydrostatic body fat test done, and that is considered to be the most accurate measure of body composition. Although by the BMI I was well overweight, my body fat composition was pretty good. The analysis I got predicted what my body fat percentage would be if I lost weight solely through fat loss. According to that chart, if I got down to ZERO body fat, I would still be overweight according to the BMI.
Around that time, DAN's Alert Diver magazine published an article about the high percentage of dive fatalities in which the divers were overweight or obese, according to the BMI. I challenged that article on the basis of what I just wrote above, and they then did a follow up article in which they compared ways to determine fitness to dive. Their conclusion was that the BMI was the very worst way to measure personal fitness.
If we are going to talk about obesity for this discussion, I think we have to use the "I know it when I see it" defintion--someone with scade of fat and not a lot of accompanying muscular development.