Kim:I have no problem with people who are anti-whaling, stand up and say so, and try to get it stopped from within the IWC. I also have no problem with people who argue that point of view from an objective stand point. I don't and won't eat whale myself and if it was being done for me they could stop doing it tomorrow as I don't need it.
If you check my posts in the threads concerned I think it will be clear enough that I find it wrong for one culture to try to assume a sort of moral superiority about something that someone else is doing while at the same time defending their own right to behave exactly how they wish even if the whole world is against them. It strikes me as hypocritical. When I see that I feel the need to try to explain from the Japanese perspective the reasons for their actions. This does not mean that I support what they do personally - it simply means that I choose not to judge them by my own standards.
Whales are sea mammals. We eat several land mammals some of whom have a provably high intelligence. Even if they didn't I personally think that justifying eating some - but not others - is very morally suspect. .
Very interesting. Check the recent BBC thread I posted. I would imagine that Stanford U. did a decent job with their DNA metrics.
Cultures are shaped by other cultures. Japan's predominant cultural influence has always been China. Much as the Japanese don't like to admit it. Hence, my argument is that other countries have always had sway in each other's welfare / economics since the beginning of the first human skirmish for food.
I use a particular standard to meter my perspective. I believe that no one has the right to hurt another and I believe that individuals have a right to their own thoughts. In the case of the Minkes I believe there is a large potential for these whaling nations to deprive the world of a global, migratory species. Convenient phrases like “breeding like cockroaches’ are merely propaganda to get the hunt started.
With the Antarctic Minkes, true sustainability runs counter to Japan’ s loosely veiled scientific expedition to collect. True sustainability is threatened by a scientific study? What a contradiction! Nobody appreciates duplicity. At least the Norwegians are up front about it. Sadly, the IWC (meant to protect this global species) is nothing more than a puppet organization with very little in the way of enforcement or teeth. The IWC reminds me of Barney Fife from the old Andy Griffith series. Says a lot, gyrates a bit and does nothing in the end.
I understand many feel that whales are just the equivalent of cows, but they are not. Ask a cetaceanologist or someone who works with them. I've worked with little whales in aquariums. Wonderful personalities. I like cows too. I also understand the need to cull when things go funny as with deer and bear in the US.
Paradigm shifts are rare things. No one expects these whaling nations to change much. However, I would just ask others watching this thread to do their best to educate the children as to the positive and negatives of hunting a pressured species just for the meat. Their influence can certainly go a long way. As per pro-harvesters, please consider that there really isn’t a huge need to go whaling other than an acquired, or cultural taste and that pressured stocks should be allowed to return to true levels of sustainability supported by reputable statistics.