Darnold9999
Contributor
Thanks for the insight. Could you give some more detail? I was thinking land based after live aboard would be a better "decompression" period. After 10-12 days (40 dives) on a boat one or both of us may have ear or other issues. My thoughts were that it would be more comfortable land based if it was physically challenging to dive. But we have not done a live aboard outside of 3 days so I am speculating.
Why do you prefer the other way around?
Thanks!
After the very draining trip to get to Indonesia from the West Coast and the time change involved, taking a day or two to recover doing the easier dives at Lembeh and then doing the more challenging dives and the more intense dive schedule of a liveaboard works better for me. I found that a more relaxing dive schedule at the beginning of a trip is best for me. I find that diving at Lembeh first gets me more attuned to the environment in Indonesia so that I actually see more on the liveaboard. I found that coming to Lembeh after a liveaboard is a bit of a let down after the intense diving at Raja. Not as much to see - lots of strange and interesting, but definitely a let down. The other way just builds with the diving getting more and more interesting from beginning to end of the trip. Doing it the other way also means that I am taking a couple of days of the liveaboard experience to work through jet lag and acclimatize. To me a waste of a very expensive couple of days.
The very best experience I have had on a Raja liveaboard was to take three weeks to vacation in Bali diving occasionally and then doing a liveaboard. Not usually an option.