Standardized Prices?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I've been thinking about this for a bit.

There's two ways to look at it. From the POV of someone who wants to drop the people and style they are currently diving and is eager to adopt GUE as their defacto form of diving; or someone who likes what they are currently doing but also wants to improve generally as a diver. The second would be me.

Money can also be thought of in two ways. For some, the money for the course comes out of a big disposable income pot and not that big a hardship in a real sense. For others it is a serious consideration. I have to see some sort of tangible value to sell it to my wife as I have a lot of competing priorities as a blue collar father of three.

That being said:

I think the course was very valuable partly in what it provided in the moment, but even more importantly in how it could set the tone for future diving. In a sense you take a course but you also have the opportunity to enter into a culture where skills development is a continuing process practiced by supportive people. The value of that would I think, partly depend on how close you live to an active GUE community but I am reasonably close to three communities so, if I wanted to, I would have plenty of opportunities to expand the skill set introduced during the course and to develop those friendships. That's a biggy that probably could be emphasized differently.

Before the course I shied away from GUE because I had the sense that it was a "take it or leave it" proposition that conflicted with my current friendships (non GUE) and the way I sometimes like to dive (vintage/solo). During the course I realized there was a very valid middle road approach. I could still keep my old friends, dive my own style, and concurrently develop a new style with new friends. Instead of one taking away from the other in an adversarial fashion, GUE involvement could be seen as complimenting my diving. That was a big aha moment that made me more receptive. How you get that message across is a good question, probably one way is by having people like me write about it.

If I look at the information presented, some I would use all the time, some I probably wouldn't but appreciate understanding anyway. One example would be standard gas. I still like air for many of my dives and my friends are all over he map but at the same time I came to really appreciate the underlying principles behind using standard gas mixes like EAN32. I certainly saw the benefits of it over best mix, which I would have previously adhered to. But that also goes to many of the concepts underlying the team approach that GUE follows.

One of my prior main objections to taking fundies was that, because my friends didn't dive that way, most of what I learned about a holistic dive regime would not be applicable to my diving experience. The course showed me something different. Though there are many specific things that I can't do with those friends, I am more aware of what could be done and can attempt to, perhaps in a smaller way, educate some of them. I don't see this as "turning them" GUE so much as just being good diving sense. I also can develop those skills with my GUE friends in the mean time.

From a skills perspective the course was very valuable. Again, not just from what was learned there, but from being shown what I needed to work on and being given the means to do so. I suppose you could get the same sort of thing from simply mentoring within the local community but I suspect there would be blank spaces in the whole picture that would get filled in via the course. And, the methodology of graduated task loading with immediate instructor feedback (plus video) was superb.

I intentionally did not practice the skills portion of the course ahead of time (probably should have) and did not even really look to see what they were and also dove a single tank. I did this so I would have the experience described by some on the board who are directed to take GUE training ie. "I am a newer diver who would like to be a better diver and am looking for what course to take next etc..." to see what the value would be. I think that put me behind the curve a bit in terms of not being better prepared and if I were going to direct someone to fundies I think I would try to connect them with a mentoring group first to work on the basics of trim/buoyancy/propulsion or have them take a GUE primer. If you struggle too much with those things I think it takes away from some of the other points you could be focusing on. I could see a whole course/workshop just on stability in the water being very beneficial to any avenue of diver.

So... is the course worth it? I think so. It isn't so much about the specifics as it is a gateway course to looking at diving in a different light. You don't have to drink the koolaid, most of what you learn will benefit you either directly or by way of increasing your knowledge base, and you will have what is most missing in all other forms of traditional dive education: The follow up framework for practicing and refining the skills you are introduced to.


Boy, after writing all that I went back and reread the previous post. I think I answered a different question.

If you are asking: After the course, did I/we feel like turning around and paying Guy for it? No, and I don't think Guy expected it. First, my wife would probably dump my body in a ditch. Second, I had/have the feeling that this was a well thought out, intentional experience that played itself out exactly as it was intended.
 
Last edited:
And that's the cheap class guys. Wait for tech 1 and 2 :)

going into it, was it harder or easier than you expected?
i find this whole exercise fascinating and I'm glad guy and everyone put it together for you guys
 
It was nicer personality wise than I expected. There was none of the elitist stuff that sometimes gets talked about on the board and all the staff was friendly yet very professional.

The concepts were pretty straight forward and graspable. The math actually got easier.

The skills portion kicked my ass. In particular trying to attain motionless stability. I totally did not expect that level of failure in myself. While frustrating, it was very valuable to me as a mirror to show where I really am in that regard. The other skills I felt would not be that difficult if the stability was there.
 
It was nicer personality wise than I expected. There was none of the elitist stuff that sometimes gets talked about on the board and all the staff was friendly yet very professional.

The concepts were pretty straight forward and graspable. The math actually got easier.

The skills portion kicked my ass. In particular trying to attain motionless stability. I totally did not expect that level of failure in myself. While frustrating, it was very valuable to me as a mirror to show where I really am in that regard. The other skills I felt would not be that difficult if the stability was there.

Once you have the stable platform the rest of it will come pretty easy. Sounds like you had a neat class
 
I think there are some really important things in what Dale has written, because they are misconceptions I've seen over and over again.

No, you don't have to dive only with GUE divers. You don't even have to dive according to GUE guidelines. When you do dive with other GUE folks, they'll likely expect you to follow the procedures and prioritize the things that GUE training prioritizes. (This can be hard for habitual solo divers, because their awareness of team may require a lot of conscious work.)

No, we are not a bunch of snobby elitist jerks. We are generally pretty avid divers, and the ethos is highly supportive of others who want to improve.

Yes, it's pretty fun to dive with a whole group of people with good skills who are on the same page you are!
 
I think there are some really important things in what Dale has written, because they are misconceptions I've seen over and over again.

No, you don't have to dive only with GUE divers. You don't even have to dive according to GUE guidelines. When you do dive with other GUE folks, they'll likely expect you to follow the procedures and prioritize the things that GUE training prioritizes. (This can be hard for habitual solo divers, because their awareness of team may require a lot of conscious work.)

No, we are not a bunch of snobby elitist jerks. We are generally pretty avid divers, and the ethos is highly supportive of others who want to improve.

Yes, it's pretty fun to dive with a whole group of people with good skills who are on the same page you are!

Well-stated. From the team concept (I am somewhat selfish, in the sense that I want to be self-reliant) to the skills portion, Fundies promotes an integrated view of diving. As someone that used to teach avalanche safety to industry professional, a standardized curriculum with assessement (e.g., exceeds expections, meets expections, etc) gives the student thoughtful and informative feedback. The class does give the student a new way of thinking about diving.

The ability to stay motionless or silently hover is perhaps the best skill set in my development as a diver. After Fundies, I feel that free diving classes added a new and positive skills. Learning how to breath, underwater calmness, and mental training for breath hold is something that does not come naturally to many divers.
 
If I look at the information presented, some I would use all the time, some I probably wouldn't but appreciate understanding anyway. One example would be standard gas. I still like air for many of my dives and my friends are all over he map but at the same time I came to really appreciate the underlying principles behind using standard gas mixes like EAN32. I certainly saw the benefits of it over best mix, which I would have previously adhered to.
While I do not advocate "best mix", neither do I like standard gases. Both ideas seem too restrictive to me. I have no problem planning and executing a 21/35 dive to 150' decompressing on 50%. I have used 21/35 and 50% many times while teaming up with UTD friends. I also feel equally comfortable planning and executing a dive to 150' on 19/23 and 45%. None of these gases are "best mix".

The most common reason why I end up with something like 19/23 is because it was probably a top up on the remnants of a deeper mix. Most of my UTD friends will not feel comfortable executing a dive with me as part of their team while I'm using the frankenmix. And the few that have executed dives with me on frankenmix, do not feel comfortable planning the dives by themselves. I suspect GUE divers might be a little more academically versatile in planning because they are taught to use programs like DecoPlanner, whereas the UTD curriculum only contemplates Ratio Deco.

From my point of view the rigidity and lack of planning versatility is a weakness in the curriculum. The standard gas paradigm was developed and became popular while GI3 was still highly involved in WKPP, DIR and even GUE. Yet even GI3 could appreciate the value of being able to use frankenmix when forced by circumstances. The following quote comes from a GI3 article entitled "Common Gas Diving Topics" (note the lack of any standard mix or "best mix" in his advice):
...Having said that, let's look at a diving situation:
I want to do the "Doria", but my captain, Janet Beiser, has to limit my gear baggage since there are others on the boat. I can be a dope and dive air (if Janet would let me), or a convolute and put air in my back tanks and take gas stages, losing redundancy in an emergency, and being forced to air at the worst possible time (like what happened in the death of Rob Parker), or sharing air with an out of gas diver, who is now hammered , scared, and on my long hose, or I can make the exact mix for one dive and then blow it into oblivion with air, or,
I can "Do It Right":
I can lose the abject fear of helium and low oxygen mixtures, and make up two sets of doubles with high helium, like 50%, and low oxygen , like 14 percent, and take stages of the exact mix for the depth , probably something like 18/33, and some stages of 50/50 and my oxygen bottle.
I dive the stages and try to save the back gas, but let's say I want to use the back gas. I can blow it back three times and still be ok on the oxygen, and probably pretty good on the helium, but what happens to the deco?
My first dive for 25 minutes is probably a good hour of deco, my second with the diluted mix is more like 52, and the third more like 45 ( relatively 60,50,40 or padded ratios like that). In other words, for a few extra minutes in the water, I get to do it safely. I then do the same with my other set, and/or my stages were dived first, and then I do a couple of back gas dives. I keep the dives to reasonable bottom times, and end up making the deco gas last longer, and as the deco gas gets diluted or lower, the deco using the higher oxygen "reblows" is getting shorter and shorter anyway, assuming I am giving myself a decent interval between dives. Most of the deco time is on oxygen anyway.
POINT here: mixes that are too low in oxygen and too high in helium are not a bad thing - this is ok. The opposite is not. The former means a tad more deco, the later means a lot more risk.
For a shallower dive, lets say 130-160, I can take my doubles with something like a 16/40 and blow that up a couple of times for back gas diving in that range with the boat's compressor. The deco pickup over a higher oxygen mix is not enough to warrant the air, especially at the more insidious depths, like 150, that have enough impairment to cause an accident, but not enough to "ring your bell" and make you aware of the impairment.
Keep in mind I am talking about trips where you have limited gear space and want to maximize your gas .
Technical diving is fun, but it is getting a bad name due to the accidents.The accidents are due to impairment from narcosis. The accidents need to stop. I repeatedly do dives that were not even thought possible by my original dive partner , Bill Gavin, and I do them safely, and I do them all the time, and they are fun to do. If I can do 300 for three hours and then go out to dinner with my pals, then you can dive the Doria or anything else without the self-imposed risk. I know what I am talking about-learn this stuff right and stop the nonsense.
If you need information to keep yourselves alive, ask me or any of the WKPP guys, and examine your own misconceptions - there is no such thing as an "air table", and the real risk is death. - G

Dale, many years ago I printed and laminated several of these tables in business card sizes to give to my friends. I couldn't find any in my house anymore, but I thought you might find it interesting: View attachment min deco english_imperial_A.pdf
 
Last edited:
From my point of view the rigidity and lack of planning versatility is a weakness in the curriculum. The standard gas paradigm was developed and became popular while GI3 was still highly involved in WKPP:
Common Gas Diving Topics[/B]" (note the lack of any standard mix or "best mix" in his advice):

I chuckled out loud when I read the part about "rigidity and lack of planning versatility" because it demonstrates that you are missing most of the point of the benefit of standardized gases and I am sure any of the students in the last class can elaborate so I won't. However, let me point everyone in the right direction by saying that we do take the "global" part in our name seriously...;-) Also, you may want to recheck your history with respect to GI3 being "highly involved in GUE".


best,

Guy
 
Some of what Trey et al did 20 years ago has evolved quite a bit.

At one time the Wkpp used colors to mark bottles and dove air to 190. Not really relevant for today's diving.
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom