I suppose you're right that many dive ops consider their divemasters to be independent contractors. That makes sense. But talk about muddying the waters. So theoretically, to get a better idea of what is the purpose of my tip, I might want to know whether my DM is a "tipped hourly employee" like a restaurant server, a contractor, or a non-paid volunteer. Theoretically. For the record, I do tip DMs!
I still disagree, and as far as waiters disagreeing with my analysis of tipping, I really don't think waiters give "tipping theory" any thought. It's more the kind of abstract thing an economics professor would ponder. As I (not a professor but just an interested amateur theorist) see it, tipping restaurant servers HAS become (essentially) "mandatory" in the US. It's original purpose--to reward good service-- has been lost over the decades and in view of IRS rules regarding paying tipped employees a lesser hourly wage and having the employer make up any shortfall. Nowadays, the practice of tipping is implicitly used to shift the burden from the employer to the customer to pay a portion of the server's compensation.
You mentioned in the previous posts that some really good bartenders (and servers) can earn big bucks from tips. As I see it, that's because they are really good at what they do. We customers are paying for the value of their services, regardless of whether we do it in the form of tips. If we didn't tip them well, then presumably the bar would have to pay them what they are worth or they would quit and find another employer who would. That may not work in practice because, with the exception of a few celebrity bartenders, they don't have that kind of bargaining power. But in theory, yes, we customers are paying a portion of the value of their services in the form of tips, and it is pretty much expected that we will do so.
Is there really a "sliding scale" anymore? The accepted range today is a narrow 15-20%. I wish it were so, but nowadays if a customer leaves less than 15% that does nothing but draw the ire of the server and potentially leave the next customer having to deal with a cranky server. The server often has no idea what he or she did wrong and doesn't learn from the experience, as some customers may believe. The best way to improve a server's poor service is to have the manager deal with the problem. Sure, a customer can leave MORE than 20% to reward exceptional service, but that doesn't make it a real "sliding scale." You still leave a base amount of 15-20%, and that is effectively an expected portion of the server's compensation, contributed directly from the customer.
. . .
That is a bit of a bizarre thought process that not even a waiter would even agree with you on. It's good you would inform the manager about poor/rude/lack of service, but you must have a fear of embarrassment if you feel you're social obligated to reward behavior that you find to be poor enough that you are going to complain about to the manager. Tipping is customary, not mandatory, that's the big difference, and the traditions of the sliding scale for tipping based on level of service is very well established in the restaurant industry.
I still disagree, and as far as waiters disagreeing with my analysis of tipping, I really don't think waiters give "tipping theory" any thought. It's more the kind of abstract thing an economics professor would ponder. As I (not a professor but just an interested amateur theorist) see it, tipping restaurant servers HAS become (essentially) "mandatory" in the US. It's original purpose--to reward good service-- has been lost over the decades and in view of IRS rules regarding paying tipped employees a lesser hourly wage and having the employer make up any shortfall. Nowadays, the practice of tipping is implicitly used to shift the burden from the employer to the customer to pay a portion of the server's compensation.
You mentioned in the previous posts that some really good bartenders (and servers) can earn big bucks from tips. As I see it, that's because they are really good at what they do. We customers are paying for the value of their services, regardless of whether we do it in the form of tips. If we didn't tip them well, then presumably the bar would have to pay them what they are worth or they would quit and find another employer who would. That may not work in practice because, with the exception of a few celebrity bartenders, they don't have that kind of bargaining power. But in theory, yes, we customers are paying a portion of the value of their services in the form of tips, and it is pretty much expected that we will do so.
Is there really a "sliding scale" anymore? The accepted range today is a narrow 15-20%. I wish it were so, but nowadays if a customer leaves less than 15% that does nothing but draw the ire of the server and potentially leave the next customer having to deal with a cranky server. The server often has no idea what he or she did wrong and doesn't learn from the experience, as some customers may believe. The best way to improve a server's poor service is to have the manager deal with the problem. Sure, a customer can leave MORE than 20% to reward exceptional service, but that doesn't make it a real "sliding scale." You still leave a base amount of 15-20%, and that is effectively an expected portion of the server's compensation, contributed directly from the customer.
Last edited: