cool_hardware52
Contributor
Correct me if I'm wrong here, Tobin, but since that the OP is diving in cool to cold water while wearing an exposure suit (wetsuit, drysuit), the wing should be able to lift the rig with a full tank of air and dive weight (backplate, backplate w/ bolted on weights, integrated weight pouches, weight belt, combination thereof) at the surface.
Proper ballast and wing capacity are not always the same thing.
Any BC needs to be able to do two things:
Float the diver's "rig" with a full tank, if they ditch it,
&
Be able to compensate for the maximum possible change in buoyancy of the diver's exposure suit.
Neither one of these requires the diver start the dive negative by the weight of their gas.
The absolute minimum ballast required is the equal to the buoyancy of the diver's exposure suit at their shallow stop depth with an empty tank.
If a diver chooses to mount all of their ballast to their rig, they will need a larger capacity BC than would be required if some of their ballast was on their person, i.e. weight belt.
For example:
Suit buoyancy = 18 lbs
80 cu ft tank (6 lbs of gas, in a non buoyant tank)
If all 18 lbs of ballast is on the rig it will be 18 + 6 = 24 lbs negative with a full tank, but the suit can only loose 18 lbs if fully compressed.
This will require a wing greater than 24 lbs.
OTOH, if the diver was using a 6 lbs weight belt, then their rig would be only 18 lbs negative with a full tank. A ~20 lbs wing is now sufficient.
20 > 18, easily float the rig with a full tank, and 20 > 18, easily compensates for a fully compressed wetsuit.
I am not a fan of mounting 100% of the required ballast to the rig for cold water single tank diving.
Tobin