chrpai once bubbled...
I'm a single tank diver, please tell me how shutting down my tank is going to help me with a blown HP hose or a freeflowing reg that won't quit.
I'm a single tank diver too.
Being able to reach my valves would lessen my stress level considerably.
In the case of a blown hp hose, of course I would signal to my buddy OOA and then shut down the valve. This would enable me to fix the problem to a certain extent and allow control to return
at depth. From there, the next step would be for my buddy to decide to either thumb the dive, or swim to a location where an ascent would be safer, such as on an upline. With no jet of gas coming from the back of my head, certainly the task loading would be considerably less.
Ditto for the freflowing reg; although I would be able to feather my valve so as to save enough gas for a safe ascent.
No doubt in both cases I would want to have gas donated to me; however, there would be one more option on the freeflowing reg scenario.
You mention task loading as a reason
not to shut down the valve... I believe that shutting down the valve would be an improvement in the task loading situation, even if purely psychological.
Additionally, shutting off the valve would at least allow me to prevent water from entering my tank, which would be bad for the tank in a variety of ways.
I've actually witnessed the donation of a first stage; a diver's first puked, and another diver literally took the second first stage off of his doubles set and attached it to the inflicted diver's rig, effectively fixing the situation.
Not that I would recommend that practice, of course... Water enters the first stage, the donating diver was now without a second first stage, etc... But the dive was immediately aborted, and both divers were able to ascend without having to donate.
Sure its a great option for people with doubles, but for a single tank diver? Do you really want him contemplating if he should reach for his valve or do you want him going for his pony, or his buddy, or for CESA ectera...
I'm not suggesting that the diver use the manipulation of the valve in lieu of receiving gas from his buddy, but yes, I would "want him" to be able to manipulate
any part of his gear for any reason at any time. I can assure you that *I* want that.
And yes ONCE I entered the water without a fully opened valve. It was during AOW with 5 dives under my belt. I calmly signled to my buddy ( instructor ) something wrong. The needle was moving ony my SPG when I was breathing and I didn't know what that meant yet.
Good thing your buddy was there, eh?
I've been taught the buddy system to a degree that is currently the standard in the industry. I do not believe that valve manipulation is a substitute for good buddy skills.
That said, I also believe that utter reliance on your buddy isn't a good thing. What if you get separated somehow? What if the vis is low and you lose him, even briefly? What if your buddy's in serious trouble and he's relying on
you for help?
I firmly believe that both divers should be not only independent, but able to offer assistance to each other at any time. This is different from the thought process that your buddy is going to make up for your shortcomings - which is what I feel "not being able to manipulate your own gear" is.
He signled share air, which I did. Then as a team he adjusted my valve, I switched back to my reg, we did a ok back and forth and went on. We were in about 20' of water when that happened and I could have just as easily ascended. This is No-D recreational diving after all.
Recreational dive limits are 130', on an NDL dive. If this situation had occurred at 130', and you knew that you couldn't "just as easily have ascended," would it have gone as well?