Wow, a guy posts a question about back mounting a small pony and you start in about slinging a couple of 40 cf deco tanks for tech diving. There are plenty of folks who prefer slinging a pony, while others prefer backmounting. Plenty who want a 30 or 40 cf tank, while others are happy with a 6 or 13. There is a lot of personal choice involved in all kinds of equipment decisions. I'm sure I could look at your configuration and point out a lot of things that could or should be done differently. For you to tell someone that it is a "bad way to go" or about what he will want in the long run is amazingly arrogant.
I routinely sling (sidemount) as many as 4 large cylinders when diving with a rebreather. But when my kids learned to dive, I equipped them with backmounted 13s as pony bottles. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that configuration for recreational diving, despite what experts like you have to say.
I don't feel that equipment decisions are personal decisions, that all work equally well, or that any posts suggesting the advantage of one method or another are inappropriate.
I see this sort of meta-critique a lot here. This is a forum for discussing scuba diving. Therefore, many of us like to make a case for doing things one way or another, because that's the purpose of this forum. I never did understand that idea of the precise terms of the OP being sacred - lots of times, people ask about doing things one way when there is an alternative that they might not have considered. Most discussions (online or in person) meander to some degree because that's the way conversations flow. It's not a legal deposition.
If you think that backmount is as good as or better than slinging, that's a perfectly reasonable position, that you should argue by telling us why. But I don't see the point of implying that we are wrong to present and explain our own preferences to the OP.