And, Peter, a compliment like that coming from you is the highest praise I could ask for!Colliam -- Thank you for a well thought out post. I KNOW it is "well thought out" because it is what I think!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
And, Peter, a compliment like that coming from you is the highest praise I could ask for!Colliam -- Thank you for a well thought out post. I KNOW it is "well thought out" because it is what I think!
Honestly, after reading this ENTIRE thread, I can say this and MEAN IT:
I rather need "rescue" in the presence of a Rescue Diver with NO supervised dives, than need "Rescue" with an OW or AOW diver with no supervised dives.... Granted the better alternative would be to dive with a more experienced diver ( whether through logged bottom time, or courses, or a mixture of both ) BUT I would ALWAYS PREFER FOR THEM TO ATLEAST KNOW THE SKILLS albeit subpar, then not know them at all.... And that's just the reality of it. I would prefer EVERYONE to be ATLEAST Rescue Diver.... Wouldn't you ?
What is the bugaboo concerning rescue? I know plenty of non-PADI Instructors who teach a full, "unconscious diver on the bottom, surface, breathe and transport with continuous rescue breathing," kind of rescue in their entry level classes, the students do fine. What seems to be the real issue here?
Marketing genius or more like the child who after murdering his parents threw himself in the mercy of the court because he was an orphan?
What is the bugaboo concerning rescue? I know plenty of non-PADI Instructors who teach a full, "unconscious diver on the bottom, surface, breathe and transport with continuous rescue breathing," kind of rescue in their entry level classes, the students do fine. What seems to be the real issue here?