ScubaSteve
Wow.....what a DB
I agree that we are thanking the post, not the person. I have a tremendous amount of respect for some posters on Scubaboard and rarely thank their post if it was not exception in some way IMO.....the obvious (to most) exception is the Lionfish thread.
As has been said many times it would likely have been a better decision to simply hide the individual thanks count and keep the hack installed. This would have prevented an inflated **** to mislead a new member. Instead, we are where we are.
I ask a question back. At what point does it become unreasonable trying to protect a person from themselves to the detriment of the rest of the board? For clarification, this question is bigger than just the THANKs issue.
As has been said many times it would likely have been a better decision to simply hide the individual thanks count and keep the hack installed. This would have prevented an inflated **** to mislead a new member. Instead, we are where we are.
I ask a question back. At what point does it become unreasonable trying to protect a person from themselves to the detriment of the rest of the board? For clarification, this question is bigger than just the THANKs issue.
Is there the possibility that someone could run up their "Thanks!" count in so many of those nonsensical threads that it would lend an air of "Earned Authority" to them, and possibly mislead a newer or uneducated member into considering what they say, whether it was sound advice or not? I realize that subsequent posts may clarify that bad information, but what if it is clarified by members with lower "Thanks!" counts- does that make their opinions appear to be of less authority?
And is it the person we are thanking, or that particular post's information? Wouldn't the number of "Thanks!" a post received be a better indicator of it's worth than the number of "Thanks!" the poster receives?