I really do not see any reason to replace the Apeks. As for the service kit, there must be a way to source it even in US!!
Depends. And the distinction is very fitting for a thread asking about equipment that is the “same”...
Apeks is owned by Aqualung, who, like most traditional scuba equipment manufacturers, is 100% against service of their equipment by anyone other than an authorized dealer. They will not sell you a kit, and they do not allow their dealers to sell you a kit – and will go after a dealer who is found doing so. So in the United States, unless you “know a guy“, it is extremely difficult or practically impossible to get a service kit made by the company who makes your regulators. (EU has regulations that prevents such dealer lock in, so this is really only true for the United States.)
Now, the (e.g.) Apeks DST first and XTX50 second have been extensively copied. There are therefore numerous companies who sell a regulator with their logo on it that is visually indistinguishable. Not “the same”: I do not *believe* that the factory that makes Apeks regs also makes ones for other manufacturers, though I’m not certain of this. (
@cerich might have more authoritative info.) But even so, pretty darn functionally identical, and of course designed to be exactly compatible with the original service kits.
Which means that the service kits made for those other regulators are also, in theory, exactly compatible with the original Apeks regulators! And those kits are extremely easy to get: you could get them from Northeast scuba supply, dive gear express, dive right in scuba, wherever.
But are they “the same”? Hard to say. Apeks does not specifically identify every characteristic of every part in their service kit. Why should they? My understanding is also that there’s something oddly specific in their kits (80 duro O-rings?) which are not common. It’s vanishingly unlikely that the people who supply the service kits for those clone regulators have supplied parts that are truly indistinguishable from an Apeks kit. In the end, they might function 100% as well. Or they may not. You just don’t know.
Of course, these problems can compound. When you look at the evolution of these very similar regulators, many of them started out looking truly identical. But over time, even the clone designs evolve. Either they want to differentiate, or they want to improve (which, sadly, are not always the same thing…
). That may mean that small adjustments to the service kit might be warranted. Maybe a softer or firmer diaphragm, say. Do they clearly define all these differences? No: why should they any more than Apeks did?
If you search for posts
@cerich has made in the past, he has openly discussed some of these issues as designs have migrated and evolved from Apeks to Hog to Deep6 to DGX or DRIS… (And back to Deep6 with the Scribble/Excursion!) As the guy having done the designing and building (or, managing the build...) for a couple of different companies, he’s definitely in a position to know.
Of course, this is no different than something like, say, oil filters. When you buy your car, it comes with an oil filter designed to the exact specifications of the manufacturer. But when you need to replace it, what do you do?
You could either go to the dealership and get the service. In that case, they should be using the device made by the original equipment manufacturer: that’s where we get the term OEM. Or, maybe you go to the local quick lube place. They are most definitely not using the OEM part. They’re using a part made by somebody who created an object of the same size and shape that screws into the same place. But very likely with no knowledge of any of the requirements that went into the original filter.
I actually did computer consulting for a company that made OEM oil filters. He talked one day about the difference between his filters and aftermarket filters: the thickness of the paper, the number and shape of pleats, the filtering capability of the paper, how much it opposes the flow of oil, etc. He said you’d be amazed at the limitations the car makers put on the filters that they have to design, and that none of the aftermarket filters bother to even come close. So, when you’re getting that aftermarket oil filter, are you really getting the “same“ thing?
Probably not. But does it matter? I don’t hear of too many engines suffering catastrophic failures because of a bad oil filter. Of course, maybe cars would last twice as long if we used better oil filters...
Probably also depends on what the original car was. Toyota Corolla? I’d probably go with an aftermarket filter. Mercedes? If you could afford the Mercedes in the first place, maybe you should put the right parts into it, too…
I feel the same way about scuba gear. I proudly use regulators that are clearly clones of the Apeks design, primarily because I wish to service them myself, and Apeks has made it very clear that they don’t want me to do that and won’t support me when I do. So I choose to buy regulars from the companies that not only allow but support me in doing that. And I buy their service kits. Besides, the regulators are somewhere between half and 2/3 the price. For me, that’s a win-win!
But if I had spent the money on a premium Apeks regulator? Yeah, I’d certainly want to make sure that it had the proper Apeks parts. Unfortunately, that means taking it to the dealer. Because, while the service kits we can buy in the United States may be dimensionally and visually indistinguishable, there’s absolutely no way to know if they are actually what Apeks wants in the regulator. And a service kit has a lot more to do with the function and reliability of a regulator and an oil filter does in a car‘s engine.
But this really does go back to what someone’s definition of “same“ is. Which is why this entire thread is kind of useless: without a clear understanding of what any one person wants to achieve and is willing to compromise on, it’s impossible to give anything close to a meaningful answer. How are you supposed to do that for a generic audience?
ETA: I Voice dictated this, and of course it wants to use the English word “Apex” for the name of the regulator. I’ve tried to correct it, but I swear I think it’s going back and fixing (ahem) them. So I gave up. You’ll have to substitute the right one in your mind!